<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>mischief - the adventures of maxi-Andy - Latest Comments in http://andytgeezer.blogspot.com/2007/10/aiming-low-or-how-i-came-to-hate.html</title><link>http://andytgeezer.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://andytgeezer.disqus.com/httpandytgeezerblogspotcom200710aiming_low_or_how_i_came_to_hatehtml/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:42:00 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: http://andytgeezer.blogspot.com/2007/10/aiming-low-or-how-i-came-to-hate.html</title><link>http://andytgeezer.blogspot.com/2007/10/aiming-low-or-how-i-came-to-hate.html#comment-21867451</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm utterly fed up with this course as are my class.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We are an independent school - our SMT are considering opting for a more traditional style IGCSE instead. Unfortunately, our biology and chemistry departments want to stay with 360 and so we, as physicists, are stuck with it. It highlights perfectly the different approaches needed within the 3 disciplines and why they can't easily be lumped together as "science" for teaching purposes.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:42:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://andytgeezer.blogspot.com/2007/10/aiming-low-or-how-i-came-to-hate.html</title><link>http://andytgeezer.blogspot.com/2007/10/aiming-low-or-how-i-came-to-hate.html#comment-21867452</link><description>&lt;p&gt;RQxBZA The best blog you have!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">&lt;a href="http://hydrocodone.99</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 06:05:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://andytgeezer.blogspot.com/2007/10/aiming-low-or-how-i-came-to-hate.html</title><link>http://andytgeezer.blogspot.com/2007/10/aiming-low-or-how-i-came-to-hate.html#comment-21867453</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Coursework!? Sorry dear, coursework has been deemed too open to fraud these days (and probably too hard for the kids, as tends to be the assumption these days) so it no longer exists.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Instead you could sit a multiple choice paper and get a GCSE. The first paper is a multichoice you see...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mischief</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:25:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://andytgeezer.blogspot.com/2007/10/aiming-low-or-how-i-came-to-hate.html</title><link>http://andytgeezer.blogspot.com/2007/10/aiming-low-or-how-i-came-to-hate.html#comment-21867454</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agreed #4!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I did GCE O level separate sciences - and it was fecking hard, classic science. It exercised the brain rather than bedding it down with a duvet &amp;amp; feeding it mental marshmallows. I could probably do the GCSE coursework now, this minute, with no revision!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jools</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:02:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://andytgeezer.blogspot.com/2007/10/aiming-low-or-how-i-came-to-hate.html</title><link>http://andytgeezer.blogspot.com/2007/10/aiming-low-or-how-i-came-to-hate.html#comment-21867455</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Couldn't agree more Andy.&lt;br&gt;Science is being reduced to 'media science' and it's not just the doofs at EDEXCEL, AQA are turning A level physics into questions about ipods.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.wellingtongrey.net/articles/archive/2007-06-07--open-letter-aqa.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.wellingtongrey.net/articles/archive/2007-06-07--open-letter-aqa.html"&gt;http://www.wellingtongrey.n...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;And what science stories do we see in the news? Endless dross about how 'boffins' have come up with the 'ideal formula' for dunking biscuits/love/parking a car/choosing a jumper.  No wonder kids are beginning to think science is a doss subject.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">neil</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 18:29:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://andytgeezer.blogspot.com/2007/10/aiming-low-or-how-i-came-to-hate.html</title><link>http://andytgeezer.blogspot.com/2007/10/aiming-low-or-how-i-came-to-hate.html#comment-21867456</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Totally agree.. a complete pile of shite.. who in EDEXCEL wrote this crap???&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Earl Grey TEA</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 04:43:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://andytgeezer.blogspot.com/2007/10/aiming-low-or-how-i-came-to-hate.html</title><link>http://andytgeezer.blogspot.com/2007/10/aiming-low-or-how-i-came-to-hate.html#comment-21867457</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Glad I'm not alone Anonymous. It's an embarrassment to the teaching profession.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mischief</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 17:30:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://andytgeezer.blogspot.com/2007/10/aiming-low-or-how-i-came-to-hate.html</title><link>http://andytgeezer.blogspot.com/2007/10/aiming-low-or-how-i-came-to-hate.html#comment-21867458</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agreed - I've just finished teaching my first topic (Making Changes) and thought I'd had a boring time as Chemistry isn't my specialism, but now that I think about it the chapter was full of shallow disconnected facts and tidbits with none of the conceptual understanding I normally associate with science... Dull and boring.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 16:19:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>